FRAND Damages: Comparing the Four Leading Cases, Including CSIRO

FRAND Damages: Comparing the Four Leading Cases, Including CSIRO

Speaking Engagement

This month the Federal Circuit issued its decision in CSIRO v. Cisco that agreed-in-part and disagreed-in-part with the district court's damages award regarding a patent essential to a WiFi standard. During this event,Ā speakers will compare CSIRO with three key earlier opinions that give insight into proving and determining a reasonable royalty for a standard essential patent (SEP): the Federal Circuit's earlier decision in Ericsson v. D-Link, the Ninth Circuit's decision in Microsoft v. Motorola, and Judge Holderman's Northern District of Illinois decision in In Re Innovatio IP Ventures.

The panel, which includes WilmerHale Partner Tim Syrett, will discuss where the opinions converge and the nuances in how they differ, and how courts are likely to view these issues in the future.

Read More About the Event

Speakers

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.