CJEU Finds UK Infringement of EU Law in Lifting Stay on Enforcement of ICSID Award

CJEU Finds UK Infringement of EU Law in Lifting Stay on Enforcement of ICSID Award

Publication

In an article published by Daily Jus, Associate Erica Li discusses the Court of Justice of the European Union’s latest decision in Micula. The court held in European Commission v. United Kingdom, that the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Micula v. Romania, where the UKSC lifted a stay on the enforcement of an ICSID Award, violated the UK’s EU law obligations.

Excerpt: “The CJEU disagreed with the UKSC’s decision. In the CJEU’s view, not only would enforcement of the Award constitute a breach of the UK’s EU law obligations, but it also “seriously compromised the EU legal order.”

The difference in opinion between the CJEU and the UKSC stemmed from their different interpretations of Article 351 TFEU. While the CJEU held that the Convention was, in principle, an international agreement capable of falling within the scope of Article 351, the UK did not owe any obligations to third countries (i.e, non-EU Member States) under the Convention to enforce the Award.”

Read the full article. 

 

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.