Interlocking Directorates Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act: Driving a 100-Year-Old Statute Past Its Limits?

Interlocking Directorates Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act: Driving a 100-Year-Old Statute Past Its Limits?

Publication
WilmerHale’s Nana Wilberforce, Leon Greenfield and Álvaro Mateo Alonso authored a chronicle for Competition Policy International, “Interlocking Directorates Under Section 8 of the Clayton Act: Driving a 100-Year-Old Statute Past Its Limits?”  

Excerpt: The US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have recently announced an aggressive approach to enforcing Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which (with some exceptions) absolutely prohibits director or officer interlocks between competing corporations. This article describes Section 8’s statutory text and considers the harms to competition Section 8 seeks to prevent; outlines the U.S. agencies expanded approach to enforcement; describes how the statute’s boundaries may be tested and some recurring unsettled issues; and contributes a few thoughts regarding the future of Section 8 enforcement. Although a more aggressive approach to Section 8 enforcement can bring benefits in some circumstances, it is important that the agencies respect the limits of the statute and do not overreach.

Read the full Competition Policy International Chronicle.

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.