High Court To Clarify Murky Insider Trading Rules

High Court To Clarify Murky Insider Trading Rules

Publication

Matthew Martens is quoted in this Law360  article, which discusses the US Supreme Court's first insider trading case in nearly two decades that may clarify whether prosecutors must show an insider received a pecuniary benefit to criminally convict tippers or tippees.

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.