Danielle Morris has 15 years of experience advising clients on all aspects of international arbitration. Her practice spans both private and public international law, with a focus on investor-State arbitration. She has worked on a range of commercial and investment arbitrations, both institutional and ad hoc, from the pre-dispute and notice of dispute stage through merits submissions and hearings through to set-aside and enforcement. She also assists clients with investment planning and advises on how to avoid or amicably resolve disputes outside the arbitration process. 

Danielle has represented clients in various sectors, including mining, oil and gas, financial services, construction, pharmaceutical and automotive. She regularly advises clients on the substantive protections and dispute resolution mechanisms under various investment treaties, both bilateral and multilateral, and has represented both investors and States in investment arbitrations. She has also advised an African State regarding a boundary mediation.

From 2008–2011, Danielle was an attorney adviser with the United States Department of State, Office of the Legal Adviser, in the Office of International Claims and Investment Disputes. Her portfolio included representing the United States in NAFTA arbitrations and in proceedings before the Iran-US Claims Tribunal. She also assisted U.S. citizens with international claims for compensation against South-East and East European States. As a member of the NAFTA team, Danielle argued part of the United States' case in Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. United States. She also played a significant role on the team for Case No. A/15(II:A), a State-to-State arbitration under Paragraph 9 of the Algiers Accords before the Iran-US Claims Tribunal.

Danielle has taught both international commercial arbitration and investment arbitration at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. She has also lectured at Cambridge University, Duke University School of Law, Georgetown University Law Center and University of Michigan Law School. Ms. Morris speaks and publishes regularly on issues relevant to investment arbitration and investment planning.

Experience

    • Represented a Chinese investor in an ICSID arbitration against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia arising out of the cancellation of a telecommunications license.
    • Represented a UK investor in an UNCITRAL arbitration against the People’s Republic of China arising out of the expropriation of land use rights.
    • Represented a Singaporean company in related AAA/ICDR arbitrations against a US multinational company arising out of the termination of a suite of distribution and franchise agreements in South-East Asia.
    • Represented a Cypriot investor in an ICSID arbitration against Armenia arising out of an investment in the mining sector.
    • Represented a South-East Asian State in an UNCITRAL arbitration against a number of US investors arising out of the State-owned oil and gas company’s cancellation of an offshore oil and gas concession.
    • Represented a supplier of refractory products in an ICDR arbitration against a procurement logistics provider relating to a contract that could not be performed due to sanctions against a Latin American State.
    • Represented a European construction company in an ICSID arbitration against a Middle Eastern State arising out of the construction of a power plant.
    • Represented a US pharmaceutical company in an UNCITRAL arbitration against a Latin American State arising out of a denial of justice and in related set aside proceedings, which confirmed the award in favor of our client.
    • Represented Austrian banks against an Eastern European State in ICSID arbitrations arising out of the retroactive conversion of loans from CHF into EUR.
    • Represented a major South-East Asian oil and gas exploration and production company in relation to two related ICC and UNCITRAL arbitrations with a combined value of US$ 3 billion.

Recognition

  • Selected for recognition as a leading arbitration practitioner in the 2024 and 2025 editions of Lexology Index: Arbitration. Danielle’s peers praise her as “understand[ing] the government perspective and the private sector perspective very well.”
  • Recommended by The Legal 500 United States for her international arbitration practice.
  • Recognized in the 2022–2024 editions of Chambers USA Guide for International Arbitration: Counsel nationwide. Danielle’s clients describe her as “a sophisticated, brilliant mind who executes strategy without flinching” and emphasize her “unwavering professionalism and commitment to quality,” which “have had a significant impact on ensuring the consistent delivery of high quality work.”
  • Named in the 2023 and 2024 editions of Lawdragon's Global Litigation 500, which recognizes lawyers who specialize in international arbitration, public international litigation and global controversies.

Insights & News

Credentials

  • Education

    • JD, Yale Law School, 2007

      Editor, Yale Law Journal, Editor, Yale Law & Policy Review
    • BA, Humanities, Yale University, 2002

      summa cum laude Phi Beta Kappa
  • Admissions

    • District of Columbia

    • New York

  • Clerkships

    • The Hon. Mark R. Kravitz, US District Court for the District of Connecticut, 2007 - 2008

Credentials

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.