Experience

• • Successfully argued before the Federal Circuit the review of a district court’s dismissal of a case brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146; Federal Circuit affirmed that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over an appeal of an interference under § 146 based on changes made in the AIA, and further affirmed that interference estoppel was correctly applied in the underlying interference. The Federal Circuit awarded costs.  
  • Successfully argued a four-patent case before the Federal Circuit; obtained reversal of all four summary judgment non-infringement verdicts, and remand to the district court for trial.
  • Successfully tried a complex computer software case in the AAA/ICDR 
  • Was a member of the team that successfully tried a high-profile smartphone litigation leading to a jury verdict of over $1 billion
  • Successfully tried, and sustained on appeal, a 17-day bench trial resulting in a ruling that six patents were unenforceable as a result of inequitable conduct by the patentee and in an award of $2.74 million in attorneys' fees
  • Obtained a summary judgment of non-infringement, sustained on appeal, in a digital imaging patent case pending in the District of Delaware
  • Successfully represented a manufacturer of GPS chips and software as a complainant in a Section 337 proceeding before the ITC, resulting in a finding of a violation based on infringement of all six asserted patents
  • Successfully represented a digital camera technology company as a complainant in a Section 337 proceeding before the ITC against two cellular handset manufacturers, resulting in a finding of violation based on infringement of both asserted patents