Disincentives to Leniency: Proposals to Revive the Golden Goose

Disincentives to Leniency: Proposals to Revive the Golden Goose

Publication

Frédéric Louis contributed a chapter to ICLG - Cartels & Leniency, which covers common issues in cartels & leniency laws and regulations including legislative framework, investigative powers, sanctions, leniency, whistle-blowing procedures, plea bargaining arrangements, appeal process and damages actions. 

Excerpt: In last year’s contribution, we focused on the reasons behind the drop in leniency applications, in particular for global cartels, arguing that ambivalent treatment of leniency applicants had compromised the essential bargain behind the success of leniency programmes, i.e. the necessity for absolute certainty, and had massively raised the costs of applying for leniency. While initially shy about their diminishing inventory of leniency cases, enforcers are increasingly acknowledging the problem. Yet, beyond vague declarations of intent and focusing on promoting other enforcement tools, very little is being done to revive the leniency goose. In this chapter, we recall the ailments leniency programmes are suffering from while proposing some remedies to revitalise these programmes.

Read the full article.

Authors

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.