PTAB/USPTO Update - April 2024

PTAB/USPTO Update - April 2024

Client Alert

Authors

USPTO News  

  • On March 8, the USPTO joined other intellectual property offices in celebrating International Women’s Day with a theme of “Invest in Women: Accelerate Progress.”

  • On March 11, the USPTO announced the new Office of Public Engagement (OPE) “to advance the agency’s mission of increasing participation in the innovation ecosystem by strengthening outreach and support to American communities.”

  • On March 12, the USPTO and U.S. Copyright Office released a report to Congress titled Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property. The report, which responded to a June 9, 2022 letter from Senator Leahy and Senator Tillis, summarized comments from stakeholders, the current state of the law, and the two Offices’ analyses, and found that no new legislation is required to address NFTs at this time.

  • On March 18, the USPTO announced the creation of a Diversity Information Platform (DI Platform), which “provides the latest available data on demographic trends by industry and U.S. state, allows organizations to gauge how they compare, facilitates the sharing of information and best practices, and reports on USPTO’s geographic and workforce diversity.”

  • On March 20, the USPTO launched the Community Outreach Campaign: Intellectual Property (IP) Champions, which will “connect[] … USPTO employees (our designated "IP Champions")—trained in providing IP awareness and educational resources to diverse audiences—with high schools and local community centers.”

Notices, Guidance, and Requests

Final Rules

Interim Rules

  • There are no new interim rules.

Proposed Rules

Proposed Legislation

  • There is no new proposed legislation.

PTAB Decisions

  • New Precedential PTAB Decisions 

    • There are no new informative PTAB decisions.

  • New Informative PTAB Decisions

    • There are no new informative PTAB decisions.

  • Director Review Decisions 

    • SynAffix B.V. v. Hangzhou DAC Biotech Co., Ltd., IPR2022-01531

      • Decision subject to Director Review – Paper 17 (August 22, 2023) [Institution Decision denying institution]

      • Order delegating Director Review to a Delegated Rehearing Panel – Paper 19 (November 16, 2023) [ordering review by an independent Delegated Rehearing Panel to “review the Decision and determine whether the record demonstrates that the Decision misapprehended or overlooked any issue raised in the Director Review request” and “to determine whether to grant rehearing”]

      • (NEW) Delegated Rehearing Panel Decision granting rehearing, vacating decision denying institution, and remanding for further proceedings – Paper 23 (DRP March 4, 2024) [granting rehearing and vacating prior decision on the basis that the “version of the [prosecution history] disclaimer [applied in the decision was] erroneous, as it misapprehend[ed] or overlook[ed] … portions of the prosecution history.”]

    • ASSA ABLOY AB v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty, Ltd., IPR2022-01006, IPR2022-01045 & IPR2022-01089

      • Decision subject to Director Review – Paper 47 (November 30, 2023) [Final Written Decision Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable]

      • (NEW) Decision vacating Final Written Decision and remanding for further proceedings – Paper 49 (March 15, 2024) [vacating Final Written Decision and remanding for further proceedings on the basis that “The Board’s Final Written Decisions employ[ed] a construction … that was not proposed by either party” and which requires supplemental briefing]

    • Ford Motor Company v. Neo Wireless LLC, IPR2023-00763

      • Decision subject to Director Review – Paper 17 (November 9, 2023) [Institution Decision denying institution]

      • Order granting Director Review – Paper 19 (December 21, 2023) [ordering review by Director]

      • (NEW) Decision vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings – Paper 28 (March 22, 2024) [vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings on the basis that coordination with another Petitioner in a related multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) is not a “significant relationship” under General Plastic for purposes of whether the Board should exercise discretion to deny institution as a follow-on petition]

    • American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC, IPR2023-00797

      • Decision subject to Director Review – Paper 14 (November 9, 2023) [Institution Decision denying institution]

      • Order granting Director Review – Paper 18 (December 21, 2023) [ordering review by Director]

      • (NEW) Decision vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings – Paper 27 (March 22, 2024) [vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings on the basis that coordination with another Petitioner in a related multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) is not a “significant relationship” under General Plastic for purposes of whether the Board should exercise discretion to deny institution as a follow-on petition]

    • General Motors LLC and Nissan North America, Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC, IPR2023-00962

      • Decision subject to Director Review – Paper 11 (December 6, 2023) [Institution Decision denying institution]

      • Order granting Director Review – Paper 12 (December 21, 2023) [ordering review by Director]

      • (NEW) Decision vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings – Paper 16 (March 22, 2024) [vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings on the basis that coordination with another Petitioner in a related multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) is not a “significant relationship” under General Plastic for purposes of whether the Board should exercise discretion to deny institution as a follow-on petition]

    • Nokia of America Corporation v. Alexander Soto and Walter Soto, IPR2023-00680, IPR2023-00681 & IPR2023-00682

      • Decision subject to Director Review – Paper 10 (November 3, 2023) [Institution Decision denying institution]

      • Order granting Director Review – Paper 12 (January 4, 2024) [ordering review by Director] 

      • (NEW) Decision vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings – Paper 18 (March 28, 2024) [vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings on the basis that “the Board did not sufficiently explain its findings that substantially the same art and substantially the same arguments were previously presented to the Office.”]

Authors

More From This Series

Notice

Unless you are an existing client, before communicating with WilmerHale by e-mail (or otherwise), please read the Disclaimer referenced by this link.(The Disclaimer is also accessible from the opening of this website). As noted therein, until you have received from us a written statement that we represent you in a particular manner (an "engagement letter") you should not send to us any confidential information about any such matter. After we have undertaken representation of you concerning a matter, you will be our client, and we may thereafter exchange confidential information freely.

Thank you for your interest in WilmerHale.